Acquital: 1 obs: PAYMENT, REQUITAL 2: release or discharge from the charge of an offense by verdict of a jury, sentence of a court, or other legal process.
Case Cite: 468 U.S. 841 (1984)
Appellant: Selective Service of the United States
Appellee: Minnesota Public Interest Research Group
Appellant Claim: That section 12(f) of the Military Selective Service Act did not constitute a bill of attainder or a violation of he Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination.
Related Cases: Cummings v. Missouri (1867) 4 Wall. 277 (1867)
: Ex Parte Garland 71 U.S. 333 (1867)
: Nixon v. Administration of General Services (1977) "a law that legislatively determines guilt and inflicts punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protection of a judicial trial, thus unfairly subjecting an individual to judgement without he benefit of a genuine legal action (emphasis added).
Section 3 Military Selective Services Act makes law that the male persons of the United States between the ages of 18-26 must REGISTER for military service under the draft.
2 July 1980, POTUS Jimmy Carter signed Presidential Proclamation No. 4771 - register within 30 days of their (male persons) eighteenth birthday.
8 September 1982, Congress passed Department of Defense Authorization Act 1983 which added 12(f) to the Selective Service Act;
that affected Federal Financial Assistance under Title IV of Higher Education Act of 1965 section 12(f)(2);
Clauses (3) and (4) of 12(f) required verifying statements of Colleges and//or Universities.
Therefore:: in LEGAL REVIEW there is this matter at Los Angeles Courts (LAX- Brandlin Scheduling//Supervising Judge; District Attorney Shapiro // Plantiffs several MECHANICAL DEFECTS at the level of the COURT itself are why the in re Prosunno Acquital herein is DEEMED Necessary, National Security Interest, and the Forthwith ORDER to the Court from in re Prosunno is to REMOVE the PC646.9(a) from Defendant JAFFE RECORD at once - or be subjected to RETALITORY ACT OF WARMAKING as Brandlin clearly vio9lated section 12(f) of the Selective Service Act BY NOT ENSURING JAFFE had 40USD$ placed upon the Los Angeles Main Jail Books under In re Faretta; thereby causing a Hate Crime to grow against Faretta JAFFE, caused Military Service to be begin at Defendant JAFFE whereas Military was NOT CONSULTED nor was DEFENDANT JAFFE given any option to ENLIST as Officer - or to discuss ex parte evidence from TRANSCRIPT as the 40$USD was not placed upon books - a vio9lation of LACJ LAX Court Faretta Policy - noted clearly printed upon several documents in 2002 et seq. viade B2 Bomber Squadron, Space Wing, Harvested DNA ILLEGALLY from DEFENDANT JAFFE, caused HARDSHIP, caused MAYHEM, Caused Tortfeasor against DEFEDNANT JAFFE viade Los Angles County; caused False Filing to be upheld and denied Defendant JAFFE rights to genuine legal action.
1] Under
ACQUITAL
.... other legal process...
----> in re Prosunno;
----> in re Faretta;
----> in ri Investigative Budget of 40USD$ - an ADMINSTARTIVE ITEM regardless of outside sources of potential other budgets - the FLASE entry - or lack of Entry - reflects within FAT16//FAT32//N-T-F-S within LAMain Jail et seq Department of Technology State of CA - therein the 74-77 State Agencies FAILING AUDITS are failing due to a 40USD$ accounting error at worst an intentional HATE CRIME committed by Justice Brandlin in tandem with District Attorney Shapiro against DEFENDANT JAFFE in what appears to be not a question of Restraining Order or lack thereof - rather a DESIRE to COVER UP CRIMES AGAISNT HUMANITY that were delibereately taken in the commission of a "Jimmy-Ginny Lein" Maneuver - a form of HORSE THEFT committed in 1993-1994-1995 ets eq until TRANSCRIPT obtained indicating GEOG469A is the matter of the INTERVENTION - whereas - Berandlin determined a priori evidence prior to 1997 was INADMISSIBLE. Then committed the Crime of ADMINSTRATIVE GUILT without the benefit of a genuine legal action.
-----> in re 468 U.S. 841 (1984)
-----> 12(f) --> non registration would be ONLY grounds for LACJ-LAX courts NOT PLACING 40USD$ upon DEFENDANT JAFFE BOOKs at assigned Faretta Motion, granted Faretta Motion.
<-------------------------------------------------------------
Yields:: under in re Prosunno;
-------> in re Faretta;
-------> in re Legitimate Intervention [SEDLACEK//SNOWDEN et al., et seq.];
-------> in ri New Information = New Trial;
-----------> in re SUTRON Corporation Manual 1173-8800 (NOT TO USE N-T-F-S with sensors or to CHANNEL JAM all 8 COM Ports), VOX files, VIX Files;
-----------> in re New Horizons Computer Learning Centers (tm) JAFFE;
-----------> in re Stealth Bomber Group - B2 Bomber 20 /300 Parts/;
-----------> in re 468 U.S. 841 (1984)
DEFENDANT JAFFE (2002) is NOT GUILTY of "Stalking in Violation of a Court Order" PC646.9(a); and has been Admonished regarding Temporary Restraining Order when a NON LEGITIMATE INTEREVENTION exists - which in the Matter of PEOPLE v JAFFE (2002) there is COMPELLING EVIDECNE to demonstrate then as also at Present - that CLEAR & PRESENT DANGER exists in re ISIS//ISIL//Civil Unrest in the United States at levels noticed whereas Digital Angel (a product) and Magic Leap ( a Study) are to Federal Bureau of Investigation v. MegaUpload actions of 'CyberWarfare' that have taken costs from Citizens, Belligerents, and non Combatants - whereas IF District Attorney Shapiro done DUE DILIGENCE in 2002 and IF Brandlin, Judge-Supervisory had done DUE DILIGENCE and if Public Defenders Office had done Due Diligence - and Had Testimony from Plaintiffs & Witnesses for the Plantiffs not been Perjury - THEN potentially much of the matters regarding the Digitized Frequencies involving Policing, Dorner, Alexis, NAVY M.L.P. and devices that exist within the realm: ROBOTICS leading to DRONES to FAA and FCC determination(s) Pending - might not have led to Spring Hill Criminal Arson, a "supercell" of ISIS developing, nor two decades of DEFENDANT JAFFE et al (A CLASS OF INJURED) led to the question of multiple Orders being Yelled from within servers that are intentionally being used to CONFUSE in what is at best case "gerrymandering" and at worst case a continued effort to cover up the actions of Brandlin & Shaprio - a Criminal Conspiracy (PC182(5)) with Barry Richard-Schnier (Jaffe) later adding Wire Fraud, Voter Fraud, Criminal Negligence, Registry of Charitable Trusts Filing Negligence (Piracy) leading to "cookie cutter" off shore Tax shelters - the "Panama Papers" leading to the nature of "Missionary v Morality" as a Newspiece regarding F-L-D-S et al. et seq. reaching at Church of Scientology et al. et seq. and others to Prevent and Pervert the Due Administration of Law - or be noted as Belligerents within International Humanitarian Law viade VICE JOURNALISM/?/ Mechanically a flaw exists in that all of this cause3s the "snore" sound - a Robotic Attempt to utilize information to indicate OVERLOADING of INFRASTRUCTURE at places whereas Allegations of Fraud at DEFENDANT JAFFE (2015) are not grounded and without base - being Administrative Statistical Torture [a crime]- that affects the Teleprompter of POTUS Obama - an intentional action of War against a elected Officer of The United States of America by those attempting to foist the blame to non Residents of the united States in an effort to decry the "draft".
Considering the Industrial Complexity that Shapell Industries is within and also Zionistic efforts to destabilize and cover up what the Newspapers have stated is "education jihad"; in re New Information JAFFE would be granted a New Trial. However, in light of the sensitivity of the nature of this problem created by Los Angeles courts, District Attorney, and Plantiffs being dis honest, not ethical, and also jihadic in action - that a non genuine legal action was the predominate problem that DEFENDANT JAFFE faced in (2002) and that the evidence only circumstantially demonstrated anything beyond Thespian immaturity - that there would even be in (2004) a theatrical HBO Television Show "MONK"; that 'Mormonism' et seq. would utilize to debase DEFENDANT JAFFE in non sanctioned College FCC stations - is to DRONE practices why in re Prosunno JAFFE herein has made the Private Investigation to determine what in re Scarminach is to in re Jaffe (2002) vaide Rabobank, N.A. (2008) & (2013) bank robbery. Whereas the nature of Ventura County Sheriffs Office is NOLO CONTENDRE regarding July 4, 2015 harassment and beating of DEFENDANT JAFFE - a Crime against humanity is what the nature of IC3 COMPLAINT has discovered in re Hanssen Robert whom has significant ties to the Ojai Valley & James Brandlin, Michael Shapiro, and Others since at least 1985.
DEFENDANT JAFFE would be noticed Not Guilty at a new Trial - in all likelihood the Charge would be reduced to Violation of Restraining Order - a Crime punishable by 30 days jailtime, 1000$USD Fine - ONLY. Not a 3-5 Year Prison Sentence with Hi-Control Parole for a crime not committed. IN light of the Evidence regarding Theft of Intellectual Property, lack of argument or discussion recorded and regarding Robotics or XPERTBASIC at the Plaintiffs evidence - and he notice of Perjury alleged and Information not consistent with the allegation in 2002 it might be noteworthy to express that as a Prosunno Magistrate, not Compensated for the activity of Magistrate, DEFENDANT JAFFE has exhausted the remedy of "....other legal process...." barring an outright ACT of WARFARE - which is WARRANTED.
DEFENDANT JAFFE is Not Guilty of "Stalking in violation of a court order" PC646.9(a) (2002)//
Plaintiffs are ORDERED HEREIN to IMMEDIATELY within 30 days from this LEGAL REVIEW to FULLY RePay the 13,000USD$ Administrative Victims Fund or be charge with THEFT//||
-------> in re Faretta;
-------> in re Legitimate Intervention [SEDLACEK//SNOWDEN et al., et seq.];
-------> in ri New Information = New Trial;
-----------> in re SUTRON Corporation Manual 1173-8800 (NOT TO USE N-T-F-S with sensors or to CHANNEL JAM all 8 COM Ports), VOX files, VIX Files;
-----------> in re New Horizons Computer Learning Centers (tm) JAFFE;
-----------> in re Stealth Bomber Group - B2 Bomber 20 /300 Parts/;
-----------> in re 468 U.S. 841 (1984)
DEFENDANT JAFFE (2002) is NOT GUILTY of "Stalking in Violation of a Court Order" PC646.9(a); and has been Admonished regarding Temporary Restraining Order when a NON LEGITIMATE INTEREVENTION exists - which in the Matter of PEOPLE v JAFFE (2002) there is COMPELLING EVIDECNE to demonstrate then as also at Present - that CLEAR & PRESENT DANGER exists in re ISIS//ISIL//Civil Unrest in the United States at levels noticed whereas Digital Angel (a product) and Magic Leap ( a Study) are to Federal Bureau of Investigation v. MegaUpload actions of 'CyberWarfare' that have taken costs from Citizens, Belligerents, and non Combatants - whereas IF District Attorney Shapiro done DUE DILIGENCE in 2002 and IF Brandlin, Judge-Supervisory had done DUE DILIGENCE and if Public Defenders Office had done Due Diligence - and Had Testimony from Plaintiffs & Witnesses for the Plantiffs not been Perjury - THEN potentially much of the matters regarding the Digitized Frequencies involving Policing, Dorner, Alexis, NAVY M.L.P. and devices that exist within the realm: ROBOTICS leading to DRONES to FAA and FCC determination(s) Pending - might not have led to Spring Hill Criminal Arson, a "supercell" of ISIS developing, nor two decades of DEFENDANT JAFFE et al (A CLASS OF INJURED) led to the question of multiple Orders being Yelled from within servers that are intentionally being used to CONFUSE in what is at best case "gerrymandering" and at worst case a continued effort to cover up the actions of Brandlin & Shaprio - a Criminal Conspiracy (PC182(5)) with Barry Richard-Schnier (Jaffe) later adding Wire Fraud, Voter Fraud, Criminal Negligence, Registry of Charitable Trusts Filing Negligence (Piracy) leading to "cookie cutter" off shore Tax shelters - the "Panama Papers" leading to the nature of "Missionary v Morality" as a Newspiece regarding F-L-D-S et al. et seq. reaching at Church of Scientology et al. et seq. and others to Prevent and Pervert the Due Administration of Law - or be noted as Belligerents within International Humanitarian Law viade VICE JOURNALISM/?/ Mechanically a flaw exists in that all of this cause3s the "snore" sound - a Robotic Attempt to utilize information to indicate OVERLOADING of INFRASTRUCTURE at places whereas Allegations of Fraud at DEFENDANT JAFFE (2015) are not grounded and without base - being Administrative Statistical Torture [a crime]- that affects the Teleprompter of POTUS Obama - an intentional action of War against a elected Officer of The United States of America by those attempting to foist the blame to non Residents of the united States in an effort to decry the "draft".
Considering the Industrial Complexity that Shapell Industries is within and also Zionistic efforts to destabilize and cover up what the Newspapers have stated is "education jihad"; in re New Information JAFFE would be granted a New Trial. However, in light of the sensitivity of the nature of this problem created by Los Angeles courts, District Attorney, and Plantiffs being dis honest, not ethical, and also jihadic in action - that a non genuine legal action was the predominate problem that DEFENDANT JAFFE faced in (2002) and that the evidence only circumstantially demonstrated anything beyond Thespian immaturity - that there would even be in (2004) a theatrical HBO Television Show "MONK"; that 'Mormonism' et seq. would utilize to debase DEFENDANT JAFFE in non sanctioned College FCC stations - is to DRONE practices why in re Prosunno JAFFE herein has made the Private Investigation to determine what in re Scarminach is to in re Jaffe (2002) vaide Rabobank, N.A. (2008) & (2013) bank robbery. Whereas the nature of Ventura County Sheriffs Office is NOLO CONTENDRE regarding July 4, 2015 harassment and beating of DEFENDANT JAFFE - a Crime against humanity is what the nature of IC3 COMPLAINT has discovered in re Hanssen Robert whom has significant ties to the Ojai Valley & James Brandlin, Michael Shapiro, and Others since at least 1985.
DEFENDANT JAFFE would be noticed Not Guilty at a new Trial - in all likelihood the Charge would be reduced to Violation of Restraining Order - a Crime punishable by 30 days jailtime, 1000$USD Fine - ONLY. Not a 3-5 Year Prison Sentence with Hi-Control Parole for a crime not committed. IN light of the Evidence regarding Theft of Intellectual Property, lack of argument or discussion recorded and regarding Robotics or XPERTBASIC at the Plaintiffs evidence - and he notice of Perjury alleged and Information not consistent with the allegation in 2002 it might be noteworthy to express that as a Prosunno Magistrate, not Compensated for the activity of Magistrate, DEFENDANT JAFFE has exhausted the remedy of "....other legal process...." barring an outright ACT of WARFARE - which is WARRANTED.
DEFENDANT JAFFE is Not Guilty of "Stalking in violation of a court order" PC646.9(a) (2002)//
Plaintiffs are ORDERED HEREIN to IMMEDIATELY within 30 days from this LEGAL REVIEW to FULLY RePay the 13,000USD$ Administrative Victims Fund or be charge with THEFT//||
No comments:
Post a Comment