Sunday, August 13, 2017

This AFFIDAVIT is as a Cadre of Affidavits though each is technically Mutually Exclusive from the last or next! There isnt a First nor Last within the Scoring System - that was debated vigrosih-ly until we decided asa Cadre to ignore the fierst deux yaers of SHE AINT SHARING THE NOMS of the Cadre - what wasted time does one have with 500 poapiers to digest thus this weekend - I move to Adjourn this Class and Conveen upon Monday - I also write papers for a Fee - 10,000$US after of course I complete moi own assigned efforts - Care to Debate? Motion passes - Class meets Monday at the appoiinted time! That was Graduate degree learning - and Vous - i was seated and it felt allright upon moi back though I dont ever feel all that excellent nor exciting - so I dont care too miuch in Verification of moi individual sensations - though being within DNA Rdna THAT WAS oBTAINED ilelgally - i TEND TO BE AWARE OF THE LIGHTEST TOUCH AT 135MPH - DO YOU THINK YOU ARE DRIVING HER DADDY'S VEHICLE!? NINE HOURS OF WASTED SETTE TIME - YOU THINK ABOUT ASPIRATED FOUR STAGE TURBOS THAT HAVENT ANY KEY CARTE DUE TO YOUR BADGES! pitchdssssssss

Principle #1:  The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and can create learning experiences that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful for students.



KNOWLEDGE

            The Middle School environment consists of many factors and variables that affect the students and their abilities to learn.  The teacher, in preparation for the situations that may make learning difficult, is responsible for the structure and maintenance of the discipline they teach.    In so accepting the responsibilities inherent in creating a safe and proactive environment, the teacher must be able to exhibit knowledge; not only in the specific discipline, but, also, within the parameters of central concepts, tools of inquiry, and the structures of the discipline.  When creating the learning experiences, that make up the subject matter, the teacher is responsible for facilitating and encouraging the growth of meaningful understanding.

            As I engage in the process of teaching, I utilize several core techniques couched in methods, and grounded in a matrix of pedagogy to produce results that show meaningful understanding of subject matter.  Drawing from the understanding that students need to have subject matter bent to them to achieve the highest level of internalization (Dewey), I have found that students relate to the teacher and to each other when sufficiently engaged with the material.  I build tools that encourage the output of the highest caliber that shows how much the learner has internalized.  These assessments have been fun and rewarding for the students as well as the teacher.  They provide a wealth of information upon which future experiences can be designed

            It is necessary for the teacher to remain cognizant about situations that are influenced by flaws in the conceptual framework and lend to misconceptions about material being made.  These moments seem to occur when the structure of the learning environment has been compromised.  it is here, at this crucial moment, that the management must influence the learner to want to re-engage with the material.  The material must be made more interesting.  As Dewey stated such a short time ago, “The problem of direction is thus the problem of selecting appropriate stimuli for instincts and impulses which it is desired to employ in the gaining of new experience.”  Problems in subject matter are adverted if the students are permitted and encouraged to guide themselves in the pursuit of the knowledge, then the teacher will be successful at achieving learning goals.  All disciplines of knowledge acquisition incorporate universal elements into matrices, then the knowledge must be built into some base or fundamental component for the knowledge to be constructed into some meaningful configuration.  This configuration is what the learner draws upon to function in response to not well defined problems.  In all pursuits of knowledge, problems will arise, and decisions need to be made.  Universals, such as the above, translate one ostensibly simple truth:  To have meaningful knowledge construction, the learner needs to self-engage with the material.  The material, in other words, must be presented in an appealing way and with consistency upon which the learner can manufacture their own meaningful experience.

            Being in the teaching profession means that I must keep my theology and methodology current and well read.  The practice and demeanor of the teacher is very mush dependent on the information that one continues to gather in search of professional development.  For example, as I taught the Mathematics lessons at the University School to second and sixth grade students, I realized the importance of keeping current on standards updates.  The National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematics publishes a curriculum Evaluation that outlines expected standards for the Mathematics teacher to study and become practiced in the application of such standards.  Science teachers follow those standards outlined in BenchMark, the guide for Science teachers.

            Using mathematics as a way of structuring students’ schema and so supporting their quests for knowledge, problem solving skills become of absolute importance.  Indeed, in the social realities of the time, problem solving is of vital importance for each individual; mathematics is a important way for students to realize the order and logic of the natures of things.  Case in point, the NCTM standards identify this sometimes neglected truism: “No student should be denied access to the study of one topic because he or she has yet to master another.” (p89).  As a result of formulating ideas and techniques based on the standards such as the NCTM I become a better communicator and guide on the quest of knowledge.

            In the areas contributing to the instruction of Language Arts (English, reading, writing, drama) I blend my own pedagogy by utilizing techniques and notions related in Reading Process And Practice, by Constance Weaver.  From a socio-psycholinquistic platform, I attempt to get readers and writers to learn about the metacognitive process they use in creating meaning.  Emerging readers in any grade gain an appreciation for the types of learning strategies that work for them when I as a teacher initiate a sequence of experiences that allow the student to interpret the ways the arrive at knowledge.


EVIDENCE

            Discussions
            Free-Writes
            Tornado Study -- grade two


No comments:

Post a Comment