//GRANDSTANDING-not

Date:02/18/2017; Time:10:25PSTAM; Topic:[Quality-of-Data][AUDIT//TECHNOLOGY]

Within the anatomy of a debate is the topic, hypothetical scaffolding of engagement, premise, points & authorities, and a summary (at times a conclusive-ness) (at times a appointment leading to a potential symposia). It is in this latter methodology that many times brings a tendency or urgency towards a tendency to canvass. Canvass has an intonation of well-worn footgear, a projected & permitted quality-of-data; useful expression being arranged visits to business, schools, meeting places where potentially, health & wellness presentations do occur (e.g. Learning Annex); and potentially door-to-door throughout neighborhoods. The legalistic-minded persons tend towards that scaffolding with prepared speaking points, images, graphs depicting demographic quality-of-data. Tabulated, scattergramed, bar graphs as a few deliberate points to discuss are not always "pitched" or "sold". Instead the speaker is-allowed-to present a message - some topic that hypothetically can lead to a demonstrated ability to move the listener to donate, contribute time or effort. Contribution at times tends towards the financial, goods & services, and at times presented material that "dovetails' with the preliminary points & authorities raised in the preliminary presentation! This PLAN of ENGAGED DISCOURSE takes motivated persons in both speaker & listener to engage in what is the anatomy of the PERMISSIVE DEBATE.

Within the opposite; there is at times a passionate display of power. At times this tends towards an explosive CHANT within a massive gathering; at times, one can view such loosely organized gatherings leading towards debates that are greater than a speaker & listener or several listeners fewer than a dozen. When gatherings such as these occur, any debate can turn towards the hypothetical RALLY, audience placed buy-in for a fee - usually represented with a ticket sale with a potential criticism inherent that the speaker is ready to enjoy, ascertain debate-able, or critically exhume some deeper quality-of-data that is known at times as "deep reflexive contemplation by method RETORT". Usually the speaker is ready for the question & answer quality-of-presentation after a discoursed material - time limited; organized in speech and outlined with a natural language! Though also, the explosion does tend towards in past place_value known as rallies towards a near mayhem; a fervor; a overwhelming gathering leading to a coup. At times these are violent demonstrations filled with rage, passion, or animosity for the speaker whom should either be whisked away quickly with security-minded persons capable to move more quickly than the eventual "mob" that emerges from the demonstrated gathering. These are where the classical definition is terribly difficult to define beyond CRITICAL MASS.

When a door-to-door canvass occurs, a Preliminary Plan is most useful due to the mapping of the area. Legally the permitted go from a central area outward to where the OUTLIERS - farms, estates, or a sub[ordinate] area that spills into a second adjacent urban area. The City to City approach has the quality-of-data of diem-per-diem to canvass thousands of miles relative to the message; quickly with a goal state in the Preliminary Plan - something close to a financial goal, a donated per hour exchange of presentation-to-presentation. There are mostly encourage speakers with a CENTRALIZED CORE MESSAGE - a block with fifteen row houses per side of street leading to a Federal Post Box is different from a small town where a Post Office might have only three Post Boxes due to the small size of the Population that reaches farmland, estates, or sub-urban developments.

Gatherings tend toward a CENTRAL AREA where the CENTRALIZED CORE MESSAGE is broadcast outward from usually a podium. The speaker is usually not a panel of persons in this instance. Conversely, the canvass is from a POINT of AUTHORITY outward - the OUTLIERS in that are usually the Security-consultants, placed listeners, and the individuals whom natural tend to listening from the distance, favoring the spoken broadcast word to the natural language of the facial quality-of-data that the speaker must offer within the spoken & heard expression without being held to staring at the speaker to gain the message & CORE of that MESSAGE.

Both paradigms have a value to obtaining followers, enthusiast, and each tends towards a critical mass. These differ in several KEY COMPONENTS. Legally; the permit of the CENTRAL PODIUM APPROACH is billeted. The door-to-door construct tends towards an OUTREACH where the listener is at the "home-field" advantage.

The latter permitted tends towards the nature of BRINGING TOGETHER a wide-range of persons. Both have a quality-of-data that has to be studied carefully BEFORE application of the spoken word is begun; so to NOT ERODE THE CENTRAL CORE MESSAGE! THUS is a SCIENTIFIC-based approach to CRITICAL MASS MEDIA APPLICATION. Both have GOAL-STATES, each have a predominate success rate, each also find obstacles along the presented material leading to scolding, doors shut in half delivered critical message concepts, and ultimately HUMAN FAILING within emotion. HOWEVER; the "mob" sense can be more overwhelming swiftly - the door-to-door WHEN APPROACHED competently has a SCRIPTED Opening, a Tuned Middle Presentation, and a HEARTFELT CLOSURE. Both are useful paradigms to social media discourse.

The Third and least likely to be intrusive is the Engaged Upon within Disclaimer written expression social media networking. Not electronic mail blitz campaigns; rather a CHOICE to Engage within a Writer's domain of NATURAL LANGUAGE that leads to a greater capacity to generate a CLIENTELE of FOLLOWERS. Persons and beings that willingly meet the written expression with a maturity - even though at times the message might be immature! THE READERSHIP cares to be involved with the Ideas - then tend towards being THRILLED to be a part of the Domain of Followers. Social Media is the construct in each paradigm. However, the most PERMISSIVE in Listener as READERSHIP is the last paradigm BECAUSE THE WRITER is Crafting the MESSAGE usually for THE SELF ALONE and ALLOWING INTO THE DOMAIN, or Social Media Platform (i.e. Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn) something where the BARGING IN AT THE FRONT DOOR is not likely - within safety aware crafting. Both parties are aware of the STAYOUT feature and BOTH ARE ALSO AWARE OF THE PLEASE DO MAKE A VENUE Audience-driven Appearance - or allow the Door-to-Door construct to evolve.

IN CREATING such a PLATFORM one does not tend to be pushy about heading out door-to-door favoring FIRST A AUDIENCE DRIVEN PUBLIC GATHERING. That was the nature of what I was leading into earlier this morning. After enticing FOLLOWERS at Twitter to be prepared to have Tweets reach their ALLOWABLE spaces - laptops, phones, desktops, or other domain areas - the GATHERING was READY. Whilst I tend personally towards the Jim Morrison-esque back to the audience approach - I am not "teasing" intentionally your minds. I am listening to the nature of what occurs when I do not APPEAR! In the MULTIPLE MILLIONS OF FOLLOWERS PARADIGM, it is at times advantageous to STAGE AN APPEARANCE then hold off from appearing to determine the "mob" quality-of-data considering most of my personal writing is DISCLAIMER meaning I CARE LESS ABOUT THE READERSHIP as much as I CARE TO ALLOW THE READERSHIP to make a MEANING INDIVIDUALLY WITH THE TEXT. I tend to not care to FORCE-FEED my READERSHIP as might a landlord to serfs.

Thank you very much for allowing this BlogSpot, Twitter, and Electronic Mailing DISCLAIMER expression to not only find a CRITICAL MASS, also - thank you for taking time to ponder my whereabouts when I tend towards ascertaining why anyone would really care what I have or had to write about. You are in so many ways truly A-M-A-Z-I-N-G! beings.