this Abstract is actaully the larger Scope & Sequence of Environmental Philosophy- having given it some deeper context in the Blogs and Tweets oddly or exculpatorially blase - legally (tm)

Examine philosophical, sociological, economic, and cultural issues related to the production and consumption of food.

Use References from the years 1765-1883 the United States Agrarianism to the Green Revolution of the 1950s to Present. Explore the transformations of industrialization, technology, and migration.

Provide foundational stated goalstates of Corporations and Companies in the 1900s to the Present in food systems and commodity chains as concepts and methodological tools for uncovering the relationship between communities, agriculture, markets, and consumers.

__________________________________________________________________________

Philosophical

I. Locke

II. Mill vs Kant

Sociological

I. University with Greatest Number of Applications in

a. 1800

b. 1950

c. 2010

II. Marketing to Cities vs Rural Un Incorporated

Same Years as Contrasted as above.

Economic

I. Gold Standard pre Briton Woods

II. Post Briton Woods first three decades

III.European Union Euro

Cultural

I. Migration to River Transportation of the Ports nted most active by years above.

II. Areas of hypothetical Under Incorporated “allowances” in Behaviors as related to Estimated Guessing 1800 vs Last two Decades as pertains to LISTENING TO “RADIO TOWER FREQUENCIES mixing in the CANINE MIND nearest to the area where ZERO PEDIGREE INSURANCE IS AVAILABLE. Why not Available?

Production

Are areas nearest affected in the VICTIMIZING of the RADIO TOWERS as a Mathematical Reality by the Numbers of NOT CARING TO FOLLOW THROUGH vs Tennis Courts in the Areas that are Closest to Companies noted not Corporations.

Consumption of Food

Are there potential drawbacks Politically in the Areas related closest to Cities of Large Populations? Are there any types of areas nearest Transportation Corridors that are monitored in ways that are to be lower level BLUETOOTH frequencies where some ACTIVITY in any CYBERWAR causes a who exactly is the war against? why?

United States Farming vs Agraninism 1765 - 1883

Topic Foil in Subtextual - Military vs University?

College vs Private Academy by Regional Soil Analysis of Regional RADIO TOWER

mapping Globally by Position CyberContext in NANO STORAGE that isn't really always giving Populations what is Banned Communication because of the Non BLUETOOTH and Chakra theory?

Green Revolution 1950 - Present

What is a Revolution a Revolutionary Through or a Meeting of Revolutionaries vs Library vs Class sections by Registration number (i.e. Student Number vs Accounting at Medical Firm or LLC number)?

Foundation GOALSTATES

Corporations

I. Archer Daniels Midland

II. Tyson Foods

Companies

I. Amy’s Foods

II. Mrs. Field’s Cookies

==========================================================================================================================================

Timed Response:: INSTRUCTIONS are to write an Abstract; provide Analytical statistical section(s) with a Conclusion; to be responded to within sixty minutes for weighted and measured grade. Publication to personal site or to larger bibliographical publication required.

==========================================================================================================================================

Abstract: The years following John Locke and John Stuart Mill as a movement influenced several movements later in the following decades the idea of farming to market populations became a serious business. Of those the established Agrarian Farming trends vs the Green Revolution farming trends has led to the style of Marketing any Product(s) of stated trends leading to the Formation of Corporations vs Company models of Management. In an analysis of the Gold Standard to Floating Point to European Union EURO the use of examples of Corporations such as ADM (Archer Daniels Midland) vs Tyson Foods as measures of First-to-Market New Products and how those Markets have prevailed in the use of transportation corridors reaching market segments; the comparison being rural areas of farming to sustenance versus not -to-over production; hedging against market erosion is where a fallacy might statistically exist. In a larger Corporation and Company Cottage Industry support model where Dividends are Regionally potentially also Culturally marketed to expected consumers where a not-to-suffer trend(s) diminish and are re/calculated for supporting the consumer regional profits might increase and loss of product might decrease naturally. That the Consumer is the Dividend recipient and non dividend recipient is the manner of a non-profit managed statement that adds a quality of debate to the Boardrooms in both the Corporate or a Company or a Family Company model(s) of increased wealth economically grow; also too foundational survivability to the Future stakeholders where religions and business are measured not as one - statistically as separate though equal as the food consumer is the baseline - not the religion or business first a larger regional success statistically could be demonstrated where the use of illicit marketing traumas to family values or the gerrymandering push of only four years or eight who cares really … is dissipated to heres the PLAN you don't or cannot commit or buy in - why or why not - the reality arrives to a greater potential of species survivability regardless of the numbers.