the "niggers and their business"

isbn 0-19-505835-6 THE OXFORD COMPANION TO THE SUPREME COURT

PP 670-678

The Prisoner’s Rights of Speech essay leading from 1)what makes me a “Mexican”? to the nature of the daytime drama “Santa Barbara” to the nature of Procunier v. Martinez (1974) leads to 2) that “A. Martinez as “Cruz” Eden's Boyfriend and a detective in the dramatic series and what led martha to “knee jerk”? this led to the nature of the point of (too Jewish - family that skies together bitches a lot) to Re Writing that poem to the nature of Privacy law and Private vs Public “property”

The contention between 1693 and this One led to the nature of First Amendment rights in 2002 and the nature of the Writ stating “not stalking - however don't go there again and what compelled me to Go there again” what is typical is that ultra rich persons born to that level aren't gaming - they are past that point usually - they are simply finding ways to increase the amount of that Natural property that they have and do define theirs to protect as the Courts usually do support that natural state of being - and what led to this problem is that the nature of the Fourth Amendment was violated by it appears the Public in Ojai making me into a Public Puppet without that natural statements in attorneys offices that would be something i could immediately point to and retrieve - if you are as a thief are not aware of that natural protection of the ultra poor or impoverished whom THINK as the ultra rich as this one does all the time the nature of TOO RICH and what that means to a person in the middle caste or class that is trying to fail and intentionally then removing with a gangland style the rights PRIVATE of the PERSONAL FREEDOM to say NO and change a mindset for a moment or a day or a lifetime is the nature of DIVORCE - this is what is in part also the natural progression of what happens when a Community teams against a husband and wife or girlfriend and boyfriend that split up - for any [purpose that has a Court Ordered stay away ora measure of DIVORCE granted - however due to child welfare the nature of seeing a child is to the point admonished adjudicated or something else limited in the context of the Magistrate that makes the adjudication.

The problem in this matter is that said child is/was not the natural child of McCullar and Golian 1)- and 2) that also led to the nature of what is the point of a stepfather type advocating legally for the child over and likely above the parents ESPECIALLY when a drug culture and the culture and hatred seem to prevail over the needs of defending the immaturity of the child and the persons that are NIMBY abt the topics and then remissive as a ByLaw of what they must as a BEDSIDE MANNERED surgeon must do - a Medical Practitioner therefore are not actually any type of place but neutral - however - this little domestic strife in Ojai has led to a delimiting of the powers in the Medically Professionally Oriented family - they PUSHED too hard on some persons and caused a family - likely as best possible a Surgeon - to go from neutral to - ?open? - and that historically means MUSCLE moves fast - rather furiously if the nature of the state has been abridged in a war tactic that is subversive.

This is what I have stumbled into and what has occurred is that Ojai Community and literally caren and the faction in the stake a SECT or really nasty types that have a hell bent angle that leads to murderous rages against the political machine they have sworn to defray- that is why a BRAND OF DEMOCRACY will likely always cavalcate over a BRAND OF COMMUNISM in Democratic circles where the circle is not registered subversive .

Definitional Dilemmas

Privacy and Political Liberalism -- this topic in the section noted above leads to the subject in context 2002 PERJURED testimony Rick Frohlich and what has transpired since - in point of fact not OPINION the nature of the wedlocked Privacy rights to disclose or not upon knowledge of the wedlocked child leads to the nature of the discussion between the biological and adoptive parents (if exists) to determine the best of the choices for the child - regardless of the nature of the child's conception and subsequent birth and survival - when that happens as in the IM CLONE scandal to be a taken liberty that has no - ZERO democratic basis based upon an Agent of the State making a choice in retaliation for a Civil Liberties testimony that leads to the nature of what happened before that in which the child might have already been in jeopardy as a result of a marital strife again - the McCullar and Golian marriage ought to have been restrained o a point of meeting in public only for the rights of the child to view and be with the parent under monitoring - in that case there appears to not have been that - therefore a Judicial Gross negligence exists in ex parte and in exculpatory evidence - i can again reopen the 2002 Appeal based upon the nature f the persons the entries the parties the tomes and the literal types of activities that surrounded the nature of that divorce as it pertains to 1) my Private Property and 2) my Public Corporation.

Pell v.procunier (1974) again upheld it seems in a dramatic type of fashion the nature of the Procunier v. Martinez (1974) decision and its with merit to note the theft of the Private Property PYRAMIDER and what occurred as a way of Privacy Law thereafter. this is indeed a landmark case this one is bringing and i have a literal three to five year horizon in which to GATHER again without generating the evidence - that is my PRIVATE BUSINESS and it either has a potential of irritating the powers that are not only USA but globally insured to not be harangued by a debt rating to society at large or the Financial institutions -especially when the nature of the property at value 38KUSD$ ahs a potential of either launching a first nuclear strike without the use of keys nor push buttons from the inside out - literally and that is what is the nature of DOOM - not a day - but the literal likelihood of the type of daily entanglements that will make the powers that be - not only nation states - get so irritated that roughly a billion would be put to death - for the value of 38KUSD$ in paperwork that is and was PRIVATE and also waived - the nature of why is the xpertbasic - again a literal and private property that i had not in one or two or three dozen ways thrown out or away - if that was the case by now - five years later - literally there would be no trouble in hanging this one literally or worse - forcing this one onto a Plane to what nation state I care to go to.

Justice Hugo Black wrote “Privacy” is abroad , abstract and ambiguous concept (Griswold v. Connecticut (1965, p.509). Any commentary on the approach taken by the Supreme Court in regard to the notion of “privacy” must begin by acknowledging the truth of Black’s insight.

the Definition Dilemma is the point herein conveyed regarding the nature of CONFIDENCE ASSURANCE and Public v. Private assurances. In this One’s prolonged and deliberately differently treated Rights by the State the nature of all free Citizens and citizens that have earned back in acting in accordance with society at large regardless of debt owed financially or otherwise is why there is expungement and also the nature of Appeal- the public has aright certainly to become aware in their own fashion of the rights of the afforded “life, liberty, property” as afforded in the Bill of Rights - and to delimit that RIGHT for a Wish or a Desire or a passion if taken in the effort of “all for ____” whomever that need space belongs to - when that is found and adjudicated it leads at time to arrest and search and seizure of personal property - delimited only by the nature of the system of legal constraints that the Public is allowed or aware of demanding - thereby not being terrorist in the nature of the demand..

A professor writing a grant DEMANDS legally the nature of the grant- the funding to study or to design or to be given a right to ponder in a classroom with students the limits of stated freedoms - that is democracy - the result of manipulating the system of power to offset a Gross negligence in the Courts regarding a right of parents to observe a child welfare in public ought not be abridged by a Family need to suppress a truth that is not desired in the collective conscience as the nature of the silence is in point of fact a shock to conscience if publically noted in a way that is a terrorist or worse - a foist upon the world by a non trained “teacher” or what appears to be a cultural statement a “salupio” or a Guerilla Teacher? that is what seems to be the function of the term in revolutionary statements that are so “cutting edge” that there are not any really good studies of the nature of the term itself nor how and why it is utilized in the society at large.

When a simple fuille d’papier from say a attorney general's office that is used to send a statement written to a Court in defense of a character flaw that is not terrible illegal - unusual or unwieldy potentially though certainly already Writ to a point of judicial notice that its not a violation of law as to PC 646.9 then a week later to be served paperwork contrary to that point of law - means that a legitimate sense of “breaking “ the order to stay away makes a statement that is globally larger than the Sum of the fears that “doing time for a crime” means to the alleged.

The nature of child advocacy if there is a zero property damage noted at Court and also the nature of “innocuous” behavior is also noted in Arraignment - the dismissal immediately is what ought ot have been done in 2002 - not a perversion to attempt to contain a greater perversion of the nature of Private Property - for instance a gal and child noted as “concubines” when a type of sectarian denial exists in the actual “community” that has a stated and intended goal state of HOLDING PERSONS against their will to be held.

When that arises to the nature of a Large Corporation tasked in ByLaws intended to secure Private Property against intrusion by the State does not delimit Justice Hugo Black’s remarks as to ambiguity - the nature of the case is in fact a realistic point of why it is IMPERATIVE to be honest to the same FAULT that has been overly treated to a GENEROSITY by the PRIVATE Companies - for instance Zapata and Herken and Tobacco Giants and the types of persons capable of stating we have a NEO CLASSICAL "JEWISH - type" of identity and have a Treaty Law to do as pleased. That is not in fact the nature of the Treaty Law and what caused the “senility” of Shapell as noted by his Granddaughter Dana is in the point of gathering evidence that means a careful examination of the FACTS from a point in time to the present is imperative or the safety and security of the children themselves - especially when those children are in a baby cradle and incapable of uttering a type of statement as in NO.

That is where a personal grudge or a personal type of Truman Capote Journalistic or Veronica Guerin type of need to delve at personal cost to the nature of the required states of being that allow a child to grow unharmed into a person in society.

In the nature of the stem cell research grants the stem cells the in vitro combine is large enough to not have to STEAL the PERSONAL PRIVATE PROPERTY by force and trauma in a terrorist jihad against a system that has stead already - the need to delimit the harms FIRST then the second phase of voluntary rights of parents to allow the stem cells if the pregnancy is not viable - that is a mother's right - though to make the stem cell “donation” in a jihad terrorist style - delimits the type of goal state - if taken in say TERROR would the stem cells lead to a type of terrorist to grow in design?

That is criminal and that is segregation to not allow a full and Public debate to be stead in political realities to the public and the Populous. there is a zero sum defense to the nature of the Stake in Ojai or the type of Sandinista rage that 1693 demonstrates time and again to her own team. that is why i am pushing the topics so diligently - the point of nearly losing my mind though when The President encourages a “puppet” is what CIA factions have battled time and again since the kennedy administration - that is too expensive is literally the point of what is the nature of that “desire”.

Yes, the children are really stem cell children grown in a Valley in an incubator - though also it must be delimited to a type of PRIVATE PERSONAL PARENTAL reality that is at the biology in prime not a refined one in apartheid- that is where he radio frequencies do have merit.

The point of the children has to be seen as a usefulness - they are being given a type of terror in that the “parents’ not the biological parents are not being given a type of choice . the mother being FARBLUNGET to insane and the Father being held to a standard of poverty in terror - that is not democracy - those children with that important Family are to be not harmed,  literally - they disappear that leads to literally your immediate impeachment as the subsequent removal of the nature of your entire family delimited by the biological parents in prime. Father's Rights would send any type to the gallows for that Crimes agaisnt the State as that Adminsitrative perosn is not demonstrating publiclaly to the natural context of say The New York Times Front Page or a new England Journal of Medicine alignment with truth.

Those that get into the fray or the “mixx” become literally gangbangers and that is what this leads to in Ojai - a massive type of Jihadists camp of terror because of this need for an Order to again cry foul when they are famed for the FIRST STRIKE without any sort of legitimate cause - that is war - and that is what McCullar et al have done in TAKING THE “PROPERTY” they claim was “given away” when a personal discussion is yet to have been noted in MY ATTORNEY’s offices - obviously from the Supreme Court to the Attorney Generals of more than three steals to the ACLU to the Nature of the In Propria Persona office that i have in fact created quite legally over nearly 20 years now - its not a whim - it is in fact my goal stated time and again - to be anot subversive - though to exists in a place thats not above the law and not below the law but quite literally in the MIDST OF THE CUTTING EDGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW and the nature of Personal Property law.

Defending Minorities

“emphasis on a protected “private” realm can serve as a way of defending unpopular minorities against the power of a majority tempted to use the power of a majority tempted to use the apparatus of the state to regulate those it dislikes” for instance CHILDREN or a type of person born with blood that has zero really to do with their present point of view .

“On the one hand, there are those parents who wish to send their children to a “private” school that teaches the tenets of the i religion, against the effort by the state to outlaw sich schooling and require every child to attend a “public” school that inculcates in the child the state-mandated way of looking at the world.”(p 672)

Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925) Oregon Ku Klux Klan statements were at Court because of the nature of what is in Illinois and what is not in Illinois - again a faction or a sectarian complication that involves all of the Populous without defining why such “hatred” exists.

Autonomous Choice

The FIFTH AMENDMENT - PRIVATE PROPERTY [shall not] be taken for public use , without just compensation” (p672) in 1965 the “New property” as promulgated by then -Yale professor Charles Reich argues that the same kinds of constitutional protections should be accorded “old property” such as land, should be accorded “new property” such as social security, because of the latter’s equally vital role in preserving individual autonomy.

Throughout the 20th century but especially following the so-called constitutional revolution of 1937, has been increasingly disinclined

I am certain therefore that in the construction of my PRIVATE PERSONAL INSTITUTE and the few persons that are involved in that that they will literally soon get up and begin to move away from the point of the institute - or literally be soon dropped into the Harbor in the Tea Party day right into the midst of the battle itself - i would not advocate that you play this game - i am not gaming. the mind revolves around the nature of what is not an ADA physical or semi Mental trauma - where they have a type of thinking that is not to be tied to me or this one collectively as a PUBLIC PUPPET - as to what occurs with Impeachment - you might become the JET LI ONE obama - if that is what is the nature of less blood and hangings and more of a type of got what you wanted? therefore - that is all you get.